Skip to main content

The role of family and school-level factors in bullying and cyberbullying: a cross-sectional study.


The aim of this research  was to determine how both school-level and student-level factors affect bullying and cyberbullying.  For that the researchers analyzed data from 6,667 Year 7 students across 40 schools. 


Findings revealed that students in voluntary-aided schools reported lower bullying victimization n (0.6 (0.4, 0.9) p = 0. 008) compared to mainstream academies. This indicates that the ethos and culture of a school may offer protection against bullying. However, community  (3.9 (1.5, 10.5) p = 0.007)  and foundation 4.0 (1.6, 9.9) p = 0.003) schools had higher rates of cyberbullying perpetration. The reasons for this require further investigation.


Interestingly, schools with an Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills) rating of "Good" reported greater bullying victimization than those rated "Outstanding". This finding was consistent regardless of other school-level factors, including school type. It is speculated that schools with an "Outstanding" rating may have better awareness, prevention, and management strategies for bullying behaviors . The lowest Ofsted rating, "Requires Improvement," did not show a significant association with bullying risk, possibly due to the small sample size of schools in this category.


These findings highlight the importance of school-level factors in addressing bullying and cyberbullying, suggesting that interventions targeting organizational and management aspects may be effective. Future research should investigate these factors longitudinally to identify specific processes that promote or prevent bullying behaviors.



Family composition, specifically whether a child lives with two parents versus a single parent, is associated with their likelihood of being bullied. Young people from single-parent households are more likely to experience bullying and cyberbullying compared to those from two-parent households. This suggests that children from single-parent families may face increased vulnerability to bullying behaviors.


The study assessed family composition by categorizing students as having two parents if they reported living with any two of the following: mother, father, step-mother, step-father, foster mother, and foster father. Students were classified as having a lone parent if they reported living with only one of these parents.

While the article does not explicitly detail the mechanisms behind this association, it is possible that children from single-parent families may experience factors that increase their risk, such as lower socioeconomic status or less parental supervision . These factors could make them more vulnerable to both traditional bullying and cyberbullying.

Further research is needed to fully understand the reasons behind the observed relationship between family composition and bullying. It is important to note that this is just one factor among many that can influence a child's risk of being bullied.




Bevilacqua, L., Shackleton, N., Hale, D., Allen, E., Bond, L., Christie, D., ... & Viner, R. M. (2017). The role of family and school-level factors in bullying and cyberbullying: a cross-sectional study. BMC pediatrics, 17, 1-10.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gender Differences in Bullying

  Gender Differences in Bullying Bullying is a serious problem that happens in many places with children and teenagers like in school in sports and in summer camps I work as a coach and monitor with boys and girls in these kinds of spaces so this topic is important to me One thing that I see often is that bullying is not always the same for boys and girls boys usually show more physical bullying like hitting pushing or shouting girls usually use more relational bullying like ignoring others spreading lies or leaving someone out of the group this is something that many studies say too For example a study by Villardón Gallego et al says that boys are more likely to be involved in direct and physical bullying while girls show more indirect forms like social exclusion or emotional pressure (Villardón Gallego et al 2021) this means that sometimes bullying by girls is harder to see but it can hurt just as much Also according to the International Journal of Environmental Research an...

Audrie and Daisy (my opinions and way of thinking about it)

In this blog post, I brought you a documentary film mostly about 2 girls, Audrie and Daisy who had been sexually assaulted while being filmed and then cyberbullied. Audrie committed suicide in 2012 after all the things and the case happened to her. Daisy also tried to end her life by suicide multiple times right after the sexual crime and cyberbullying, but she was saved by her family every time (unfortunately in 2020, her attempt was fatal).    In the whole documentary we can meet both girls’ family and friends, talking about the things happened, which gives us a more emotional and devastating way of understanding what a sexual assault and cyberbullying can do to one person.   I do not want to give you spoilers or tell you the whole story; therefore, I would like to end my description here and truly advise you to watch it.     According to the World Health Organization, around 1 in 6 adolescents experience cyberbullying day by day and surprisingly and dev...

New Definition of Bullying

 Hi everyone! The World Anti-Bullying Forum, together with UNESCO, created a Working group for establishing a new definition of school bullying. Its new definition keeps the idea that bullying requires unwanted repetitive aggressiveness and imbalance of power, and adds the idea that this power imbalance is supported by societal and institutional norms. The emphasis is now in the idea that bullying is not an affair among students but a social process. The new definition is this one: School bullying is a damaging social process that is characterized by an imbalance of power driven by social (societal) and institutional norms. It is often repeated and manifests as unwanted interpersonal behaviour among students or school personnel that causes physical, social, and emotional harm to the targeted individuals or groups, and the wider school community. You can find the document where it is explained  here . Fes