Skip to main content

“Listen to me!” The role of family supervision and parental phubbing in youth cyberbullying

 “Listen to me!” The role of family supervision and parental phubbing in youth cyberbullying

Hi everyone!

I will begin by defining the term “phubbing," as it may be unfamiliar to some of you (as it initially was to me).

Phubbing means the act of ignoring the people you're with to focus on your phone or another, or as Roberts and David (2026) defines it, “the interruption of a conversation or social activity to answer or check a mobile phone”. 

Children’s digital development is mostly influenced by their families, particularly through parenting styles and guidance. Excessive control or excessive laxity do not reinforce children’s positive activities on the Internet. Therefore, a supportive parenting style, offering instruction, setting appropriate rules, and engaging in shared use of technology provides healthier Internet habits in children. 

Research highlights the benefits of instructive mediation (e.g., explaining online content and the proper way to use a device) and shared use (e.g., exploring websites or playing games together). However, negative parental behaviours, such as parental phubbing, can harm children’s digital practice and development.

Parental phubbing harms the parent-child bonds and can negatively affect children's psychological and emotional development. It weakens attachment, communication, and emotional expression, and is connected to behavioural problems and increased internalization of problems. 

Research shows that phubbing leads to feelings of rejection and low self-esteem, and may foster mobile phone addiction, social withdrawal, and aggression in children. Children may mimic this behaviour, normalizing poor digital habits and even contributing to cyberbullying (Liu et al., 2019). In support of this idea, a study by X. Wang et al. (2021) found that parental phubbing was positively related to children’s social withdrawal and aggression. However, positive parenting behaviour, which includes emotional support and guidance in digital use, can protect children from becoming involved in risky behaviour on the Internet. 

While I have focused primarily on the concept of phubbing, those interested in exploring the topic further may find this article particularly interesting. It presents a study examining the association between parental phubbing and family supervision of Internet and social media use in relation to cyberbullying victimization and aggression, which offers valuable perspectives for deeper understanding.


References

Elboj-Saso, C., Íñiguez-Berrozpe, T., Cebollero Salinas, A., & Bautista Alcaine, P. (2024). “Listen to me!” The role of family supervision and parental phubbing in youth cyberbullying. Family Relations, 73(3), 1568–1587. https://doi.org/10. 1111/fare.12968

Liu, R. D., Wang, J., Gu, D., Ding, Y., Oei, T. P., Hong, W., Zhen, R., & Li, Y. M. (2019). The effect of parental phubbing on teenager’s mobile phone dependency behaviors: The mediation role of subjective norm and dependency intention. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM. S224133

Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in human behavior, 54, 134–141. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058 

Wang, X., Qiao, Y., Li, W., & Lei, L. (2021). Parental phubbing and children’s social withdrawal and aggression: A moderated mediation model of parenting behaviors and parents’ gender. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37 (21– 22), NP19395–NP19419. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211042807


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Definition of Bullying

 Hi everyone! The World Anti-Bullying Forum, together with UNESCO, created a Working group for establishing a new definition of school bullying. Its new definition keeps the idea that bullying requires unwanted repetitive aggressiveness and imbalance of power, and adds the idea that this power imbalance is supported by societal and institutional norms. The emphasis is now in the idea that bullying is not an affair among students but a social process. The new definition is this one: School bullying is a damaging social process that is characterized by an imbalance of power driven by social (societal) and institutional norms. It is often repeated and manifests as unwanted interpersonal behaviour among students or school personnel that causes physical, social, and emotional harm to the targeted individuals or groups, and the wider school community. You can find the document where it is explained  here . Fes

Salutogenic approach and a personal opinion

  As I briefly mentioned in my previous post, on the website called PDA Bullying , among various resources, there is a section dedicated to explain the Salutogenic approach . After doing some research, it becomes clear that this approach gets its name because its main goal is to promote health and well-being . The platform aims to address bullying from this perspective, adopting a strength-based approach that focuses on individuals' potential and the creation of a cooperative community working toward a shared goal . It slightly reminds me of the No Blame Approach we studied in class, as it also refers to a method based on compassion and a solution-focused outlook , rather than assigning blame. Their aim is not simply to act against bullying, but rather to overcome it , moving beyond a simplistic understanding of bullying as just a dynamic between two individuals. Instead, they view it as a broader social process . For this reason, the protocol designed and implemented by...

The Simpsons: Bull-E

  Bull-E - The Simpsons (Season 26, Episode 21) The Simpsons has reflected bullying as a complex issue through their episodes, whether through Bart’s pranks, Nelson’s struggles, or Springfield’s collective response, the show highlights the importance of addressing bullying thoughtfully and empathetically.  Many schools and communities have anti-bullying policies, but the debates arise about how to enforce them without oppressing free expression or over-penalizing minor infractions. The episode of The Simpsons reflects these concerns by showing the challenges of finding a balance. It highlights how good intentions, like preventing bullying (passing an Anti-Bullying law), can sometimes go way too far, leading to unintended consequences. Also, it brings up the difficulty of bullying’s definition, what feels like bullying to one person might seem harmless to another, that is Homer’s storyline, which reminds us that our words and actions, even if unintended, can impact on others d...