Skip to main content

"Mit Mut gegen Mobbing"

Hello everyone! The Bavarian government in Germany has implemented the strategy “Mit Mut gegen Mobbing” (with courage against bullying), which I want to explore with you today. I discovered this strategy while researching whether there is a specific protocol for handling bullying cases in Germany, similar to the one in Catalonia.

The strategy “Mit Mut gegen Mobbing” follows the aim of raising awareness about bullying and violence, while also developing professional intervention methods. This includes the promotion of anti-bullying measures as a permanent part of the school concept. To reach these goals, the government has developed a brochure, which includes information about bullying and possible interventions. It starts by giving definitions and explaining the different roles in bullying, such as reinforcer or bystander. Additionally, the importance of the school and teachers is emphasized, with the teacher also serving as a role model for the pupils. However, the strategy also involves social workers and psychologists, who can support prevention and intervention. In contrast to the Catalan protocol for bullying, the Bavarian strategy suggests every school to develop an individual concept. While this carries the advantage that the concept can be tailored to the specific circumstances of each school, it is in my opinion questionable whether each school has the time and resources to develop an individual protocol. This made me curious and led me to research the website of my former school in Germany. Unfortunately, I was not able to find anything about bullying on their website, which led me to the assumption that their anti-bullying concept is either non-existent or invisible for the broader public. Nevertheless, the Bavarian strategy does include recommendations on how to proceed in bullying situations. When the teacher notices the occurrence of bullying, the first step should be informing the school principal about the situation. This may also include consulting other school staff, for instance social workers. Subsequently the incident should be documented in written form. For following conversations with victims, perpetrators or parents, the brochure advises that at least two individuals from the school staff are present. Furthermore, the brochure introduces a scale outlining different levels of escalations, which serves as a guide for finding the right intervention. Additionally, there are case examples presented, demonstrating possible interventions, including an acknowledgement of their advantages and limitations. Finally, the brochure provides practical materials intended to use in actual bullying situations, which I believe could be of valuable support. For instance, it includes questions that can be asked or guidance for documenting conversations or bullying situations.

In conclusion I can say that the Bavarian strategy follows important aims against bullying. Its brochure provides the schools with helpful guidelines and information. Nevertheless, I remain critical of the expectation that each school should develop its own anti-bullying concept without a binding structure. This could lead to inconsistencies in how bullying is addressed across schools.

Sources: “Mit Mut gegen Mobbing” (2020). https://www.isb.bayern.de/grundsatzthemen/paedagogische-grundsatzthemen/praevention/handreichung-mit-mut-gegen-mobbing/ , https://www.km.bayern.de/lernen/inhalte/gesundheit/praevention/gewaltpraevention/mit-mut-gegen-mobbing

Lara Düngfelder

Comments

  1. Thanks for sharing this! I found it really interesting to learn about the Bavarian strategy “Mit Mut gegen Mobbing.” I hadn’t heard of it before, and I think it’s a good step that the government provides schools with materials, definitions, and practical tools to deal with bullying.

    What stood out to me is the idea that each school should create its own anti-bullying concept. I see how this can be useful to adapt to each school’s reality, but like you mentioned, it raises questions about whether all schools have the resources and time to actually do it well. The fact that your former school doesn’t seem to have anything visible on their website kind of confirms that risk.

    I also liked how the strategy includes other professionals like social workers and psychologists, not just teachers. From what we’ve studied in psychology, we know that bullying has complex emotional and social effects, and it really needs a multidisciplinary approach.

    Overall, I think the strategy has several strengths, particularly in raising awareness and encouraging the involvement of different professionals. However, I agree with you that having a clear and unified framework would likely help ensure consistent implementation across all schools.

    Salma Garrijou

    ReplyDelete
  2. Interesting! I found it interesting that the Bavarian strategy encourages each school to create its own anti-bullying concept. This allows for flexibility, but like you mentioned, it raises concerns about whether all schools have the capacity to develop something effective. In the Netherlands, the approach is a bit more centralized, with programs like KiVa being widely used, which helps ensure more consistency across schools. Both approaches have their strengths, but clear guidance and support seem essential either way!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gender Differences in Bullying

  Gender Differences in Bullying Bullying is a serious problem that happens in many places with children and teenagers like in school in sports and in summer camps I work as a coach and monitor with boys and girls in these kinds of spaces so this topic is important to me One thing that I see often is that bullying is not always the same for boys and girls boys usually show more physical bullying like hitting pushing or shouting girls usually use more relational bullying like ignoring others spreading lies or leaving someone out of the group this is something that many studies say too For example a study by Villardón Gallego et al says that boys are more likely to be involved in direct and physical bullying while girls show more indirect forms like social exclusion or emotional pressure (Villardón Gallego et al 2021) this means that sometimes bullying by girls is harder to see but it can hurt just as much Also according to the International Journal of Environmental Research an...

Audrie and Daisy (my opinions and way of thinking about it)

In this blog post, I brought you a documentary film mostly about 2 girls, Audrie and Daisy who had been sexually assaulted while being filmed and then cyberbullied. Audrie committed suicide in 2012 after all the things and the case happened to her. Daisy also tried to end her life by suicide multiple times right after the sexual crime and cyberbullying, but she was saved by her family every time (unfortunately in 2020, her attempt was fatal).    In the whole documentary we can meet both girls’ family and friends, talking about the things happened, which gives us a more emotional and devastating way of understanding what a sexual assault and cyberbullying can do to one person.   I do not want to give you spoilers or tell you the whole story; therefore, I would like to end my description here and truly advise you to watch it.     According to the World Health Organization, around 1 in 6 adolescents experience cyberbullying day by day and surprisingly and dev...

New Definition of Bullying

 Hi everyone! The World Anti-Bullying Forum, together with UNESCO, created a Working group for establishing a new definition of school bullying. Its new definition keeps the idea that bullying requires unwanted repetitive aggressiveness and imbalance of power, and adds the idea that this power imbalance is supported by societal and institutional norms. The emphasis is now in the idea that bullying is not an affair among students but a social process. The new definition is this one: School bullying is a damaging social process that is characterized by an imbalance of power driven by social (societal) and institutional norms. It is often repeated and manifests as unwanted interpersonal behaviour among students or school personnel that causes physical, social, and emotional harm to the targeted individuals or groups, and the wider school community. You can find the document where it is explained  here . Fes