Skip to main content

Classroom-level risk factors of bullying

 

Hello everyone! After taking a look at the risk factors of bullying in class, I started doing more research and came across an article addressing this topic. Today I want to focus on risk factors regarding the classroom-level. 

Firstly, it must be pointed out that the occurrence of bullying shows variations between different classrooms and schools. While demographic influences, such as the class size, show no significant effect on the bullying rate, peer group dynamics or teacher attitudes seem to be important factors (Menesini & Salmivalli, 2017).

This reminded me of the previous session, in which we discussed potential reasons why students choose not to disclose being victimized to their teachers. One example was the perception of students that teachers would blame the victim.

The significant role of peer group dynamic is shown by an increase of bullying when “peer status […] or power […] are centred upon few individuals rather than being evenly distributed” (Menesini & Salmivalli, 2017, p.246). 

Moreover, classroom norms affect participation in bullying. For instance, a decreased amount of antibullying norms is connected to an increased risk of bullying in the classroom. In addition to that, the reactions of the classmates may reinforce the bullies’ behaviour, which also represents the classroom norms (Menesini & Salmivalli, 2017). 

Previous studies have proposed “that individual vulnerabilities are more likely to lead to victimization when the classroom context allows that to happen” (Menesini & Salmivalli, 2017, p.246).

Furthermore, teacher characteristics influence the occurrence of bullying in the classroom (Menesini & Salmivalli, 2017). This can be exemplified by the implementation of an antibullying intervention named KiVa, which led to “changes in student perceptions of their teachers’ bullying-related attitudes” (Menesini & Salmivalli, 2017, p.247). The students estimated “their teachers’ attitude as more disapproving of bullying” which resulted in decreasing bullying rates (Menesini & Salmivalli, 2017, p.247).

Source: Menesini, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2017). Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions. Psychology, Health & Medicine22(sup1), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2017.1279740

Lara Düngfelder

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Definition of Bullying

 Hi everyone! The World Anti-Bullying Forum, together with UNESCO, created a Working group for establishing a new definition of school bullying. Its new definition keeps the idea that bullying requires unwanted repetitive aggressiveness and imbalance of power, and adds the idea that this power imbalance is supported by societal and institutional norms. The emphasis is now in the idea that bullying is not an affair among students but a social process. The new definition is this one: School bullying is a damaging social process that is characterized by an imbalance of power driven by social (societal) and institutional norms. It is often repeated and manifests as unwanted interpersonal behaviour among students or school personnel that causes physical, social, and emotional harm to the targeted individuals or groups, and the wider school community. You can find the document where it is explained  here . Fes

Salutogenic approach and a personal opinion

  As I briefly mentioned in my previous post, on the website called PDA Bullying , among various resources, there is a section dedicated to explain the Salutogenic approach . After doing some research, it becomes clear that this approach gets its name because its main goal is to promote health and well-being . The platform aims to address bullying from this perspective, adopting a strength-based approach that focuses on individuals' potential and the creation of a cooperative community working toward a shared goal . It slightly reminds me of the No Blame Approach we studied in class, as it also refers to a method based on compassion and a solution-focused outlook , rather than assigning blame. Their aim is not simply to act against bullying, but rather to overcome it , moving beyond a simplistic understanding of bullying as just a dynamic between two individuals. Instead, they view it as a broader social process . For this reason, the protocol designed and implemented by...

The Simpsons: Bull-E

  Bull-E - The Simpsons (Season 26, Episode 21) The Simpsons has reflected bullying as a complex issue through their episodes, whether through Bart’s pranks, Nelson’s struggles, or Springfield’s collective response, the show highlights the importance of addressing bullying thoughtfully and empathetically.  Many schools and communities have anti-bullying policies, but the debates arise about how to enforce them without oppressing free expression or over-penalizing minor infractions. The episode of The Simpsons reflects these concerns by showing the challenges of finding a balance. It highlights how good intentions, like preventing bullying (passing an Anti-Bullying law), can sometimes go way too far, leading to unintended consequences. Also, it brings up the difficulty of bullying’s definition, what feels like bullying to one person might seem harmless to another, that is Homer’s storyline, which reminds us that our words and actions, even if unintended, can impact on others d...